Gray v. Chacon
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY
BARKER, District Judge.
Only recently this court was asked to consider Indiana’s common law rules regarding the release of joint tortfeasors. At that time the court found that “Indiana courts continue to cling to the rule that the release of one joint tortfeasor necessarily functions as a release of all joint tort-feasors regardless of the parties’ manifest intention to preserve the victim’s claim against other joint tortfeasors.” Fetz v. E & L Truck Rental Co., 670 F.Supp. 261, 263 (S.D.Ind.1987) (emphasis omitted). With this case the court is asked to consider what impact the adoption…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bedwell v. DeboltIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Daily v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
- American Transport Co. v. Central Indiana Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Huffman v. Monroe County Community School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Rockrohr v. Norfolk Southern Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1992
- Roggow v. Mineral Processing Corp., Needmore Processing DivisionDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1988
- Smith v. HansenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Payton v. BensonDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.