Legal Opinion
Caldwell Trucking PRP Group v. Spaulding Composites Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 13, 1995No. Civ. 94-3531 (WGB)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Caldwell Trucking PRP Group (“PRP Group”), is an unincorporated association of the parties attempting to remediate hazardous substance contamination at the Caldwell Trucking site pursuant to a consent decree entered by this Court in State of New Jersey and United States of America v. the Carborundum Company et al., consolidated Civil Action no. 94-1437. Compl. ¶¶ 9, 16. Spaulding was not a party to this consent decree even though the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) had identified Spaulding, along with the members of the PRP…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, LPDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Liberty International Underwriters Canada v. Scottsdale InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013
- Spaulding Composites Co. v. Aetna Cas. and Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- 2435 Plainfield Avenue, Inc. v. Township of Scotch Plains (In Re 2435 Plainfield Avenue, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- In Re Bayside Prison LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.