Goddard v. Merchants' Exchange
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J. By-laws, to be valid, must not be inconsistent with the general principles of the common-law as recognized in this State, nor contrary to general public policy or common right. — 3 Salk. 76; Williams v. Railroad Co., 28 Eng.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J. By-laws, to be valid, must not be inconsistent with the general principles of the common-law as recognized in this State, nor contrary to general public policy or common right. — 3 Salk. 76; Williams v. Railroad Co., 28 Eng. Law &Eq. 439 ; Hayden v. Noyes, 5 Conn. 391; Taylor v. Griswold, 14 N. J. L. 222 ; Dunham v. Trustees, 5 Cow. 465 ; Piscataqua v. Carter, 20 N. H. 246 ; The State et al. v. Merchants’ Exchange, 2 Mo. .App. 101. Where the vendor, in possession of personal property, sells for full value, a warranty of the title is implied,…
1Opinion of the CourtHayden, J.
This is a petition asking for an injunction to restrain the Merchants’ Exchange of St. Louis and its board of directors from censuring, suspending, or expelling the plaintiff, or from depriving him of his membership in the exchange, for his refusal to pay Meyer, another member of the exchange, a balance decided to be due to the latter for the first ten days’ storage on certain wheat bought, upon the exchange, by the plaintiff from Meyer. There was an agreed *292statement of facts, the material parts of which are given in this opinion.
The Merchants’ Exchange is a corporation, incorporating a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People ex rel. Rice v. Board of TradeIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- State ex rel. Cuppel v. Milwaukee Chamber of CommerceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
- People ex rel. Thacher v. New York Commercial Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1864
- State ex rel. Kennedy v. Union Merchants' ExchangeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
- Dickenson v. Chamber of Commerce of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Budd v. Multnomah Street Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1887
- Purdy v. Bankers' Life Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- State v. CreeleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
- Dillard v. PatonUnited States Circuit Court · 1884
- Walker v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1900