Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Mori
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 23, 1992No. C0-91-2472, C4-92-265PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Appellants S.M., N.N. and her husband, A.N., commenced actions against Dr. Hideo Mori, alleging sexual abuse. S.M. and N.N. were patients of Mori. S.M. commenced her action in Ramsey County; N.N. and A.N. commenced their action in Mower County.
Mori’s professional liability insurer, respondent St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, commenced a declaratory judgment action in Ramsey County seeking a determination that it was not obligated to pay any judgments against Mori. St. Paul Fire moved for summary judgment. N.N. and A.N. opposed the motion for summary judgment;…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Henning Nelson Construction Co. v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Bobich v. OjaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Marx v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1968
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- D.D. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. National Real Estate Clearinghouse, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997