Anchia v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice WHITTINGTON.
Appellants challenge the trial court’s order granting appellee’s special appearance. In three issues, appellants contend the trial judge erred in making certain findings of fact and conclusions of law and granting appellee’s special appearance because ap-pellee has “purposefully and voluntarily directed its activities toward the State of Texas.” We affirm the trial court’s order.
Background
Appellee is a German stock company with its effective place of business in Stuttgart, Germany. It manufactures Mercedes-Benz automobiles in Germany and sells the vehicles…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dukatt v. DukattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
- LOPEZ-JUAREZ v. Kelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
- Jarvis v. Feild, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
- Alencar v. Shaw, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- LIMITED LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. v. Villegas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.