Legal Opinion

Anchia v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 23, 2007No. 05-06-01277-CVPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice WHITTINGTON.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s order granting appellee’s special appearance. In three issues, appellants contend the trial judge erred in making certain findings of fact and conclusions of law and granting appellee’s special appearance because ap-pellee has “purposefully and voluntarily directed its activities toward the State of Texas.” We affirm the trial court’s order.

Background

Appellee is a German stock company with its effective place of business in Stuttgart, Germany. It manufactures Mercedes-Benz automobiles in Germany and sells the vehicles…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dukatt v. DukattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2011
  2. LOPEZ-JUAREZ v. Kelly, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  3. Jarvis v. Feild, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  4. Alencar v. Shaw, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  5. LIMITED LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. v. Villegas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API