Legal Opinion

Fergason v. Sullivan

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided August 27, 1991No. 88-0643-CV-W-1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

WHIPPLE, District Judge.

Before this court is plaintiffs Motion for Attorney’s Fees, filed June 13, 1991, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The motion has been fully briefed by the parties. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s motion will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

On September 8, 1986, plaintiff Dolores J. Fergason (“Fergason”) filed an application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 423. Fergason's application was denied initially and on reconsideration. She subsequently requested, and received,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Melkonyan v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Sullivan v. FinkelsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Loyce McCoy v. Richard S. Schweiker, Clifford M. Stack v. Richard S. Schweiker, James D. Desedare v. Richard S. SchweikerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Butts v. BowenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  2. Audette v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991
  3. Joseph Labrie v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Williams v. SullivanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  5. Hudson v. SullivanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API