Kuklinski v. Dibelius
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
Upon this appeal the plaintiffs contend that the defendant driver was guilty of causal negligence as a matter of law in all three respects. There was a conflict in the testimony. Dibelius testified that he was proceeding west on Mitchell street in the city of Milwaukee a short time prior to the accident. A bus was preceding him. He followed the bus west from Sixth to Seventh street where both vehicles stopped. After the bus proceeded across the intersection, he had started to pass the same and when the front end of his car was about even with the front end of the bus, the plaintiff Karen…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Thoreson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Nowatske v. OsterlohWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Savina v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WoodingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Lisowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.