Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Arpin v. Semple

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 9, 2025No. 3:24-cv-01918Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BARRY ARPIN, Plaintiff, No. 3:24-cv-1918 (SRU) v. COMMISSIONER SCOTT SEMPLE, et al., Defendants. INITIAL REVIEW ORDER The plaintiff, Barry Arpin, is a sentenced inmate in the custody of the Connecticut Department of Correction (“DOC”).1 He commenced this action pro se under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against thirteen DOC employees: Commissioner Scott Semple, Commissioner Angel Quiros, Warden Erfe,2 Warden Falcone,3 Captain Watson, Captain Morris, Lieutenant Ererle, Lieutenant Boyd, and Correction Officers Kelly, Peracchio, Vedura, Wright and Zoto.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API