Legal Opinion

Gordon v. Nall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 11, 1980No. 78-618PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants present four issues which they claim warrant reversal of a judgment in the amount of $750,000. We will discuss only two of those issues. They are:(1) whether final arguments by plaintiff's counsel that the corporate defendant "doesn't have a soul, it has a board of directors," is so highly prejudicial as to warrant reversal; and(2) whether it constituted prejudicial error to admit, over objection, hearsay evidence concerning defendant's prior acts of negligence.

Marcvtia Larvet Nall, then a three-year-old child, was severely injured when she was struck by an automobile driven by the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commercial Fire Ins. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Alaga Coach Line, Inc. v. McCarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Town of Greensboro v. EhrenreichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. Dean v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. Cherry v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United American Ins. Co. v. BrumleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. SOUTHERN LIFE AND HEALTH INS. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Ridgeview Health Care Center, Inc. v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. SOUTHERN LIFE AND HEALTH INS. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API