Gordon v. Nall
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Appellants present four issues which they claim warrant reversal of a judgment in the amount of $750,000. We will discuss only two of those issues. They are:(1) whether final arguments by plaintiff's counsel that the corporate defendant "doesn't have a soul, it has a board of directors," is so highly prejudicial as to warrant reversal; and(2) whether it constituted prejudicial error to admit, over objection, hearsay evidence concerning defendant's prior acts of negligence.
Marcvtia Larvet Nall, then a three-year-old child, was severely injured when she was struck by an automobile driven by the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commercial Fire Ins. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Alaga Coach Line, Inc. v. McCarrollSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Town of Greensboro v. EhrenreichSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Dean v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
- Cherry v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United American Ins. Co. v. BrumleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- SOUTHERN LIFE AND HEALTH INS. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ridgeview Health Care Center, Inc. v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- SOUTHERN LIFE AND HEALTH INS. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987