Legal Opinion

Claim of Kolenski v. Bernier

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 1945Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision disallowing the claim of a mother and father for *792dependency benefits. The attorney for the claimant-appellant requested that the matter be held to permit further proof from Poland. This request should have been granted. Decision reversed, with costs to the appellant, and matter remitted to the State Industrial Board. All concur, except Brewster, J., who dissents with the following memorandum: The question presented relates to the claim of claimant-appellant that she and her late husband, while residing in Poland, were supported by the deceased, in whole dr in part,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Claim of Daus v. Gunderman & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Matter of Belcher v. . Carthage Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Claim of Pifumer v. Rheinstein & Haas, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. Claim of Bonnano v. Metz Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  5. Claim of Vassilakis v. Fairfax Hotel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API