Legal Opinion
Asarco, LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided March 28, 2013No. Case No. 2:12-cv-00283-EJLPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
EDWARD J. LODGE, District Judge.
Before the Court in the above entitled matter are the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and a related Motion to Strike. The parties have filed their responsive briefing and the matter is ripe for the Court’s review. Having fully reviewed the record herein, the Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record. Accordingly, in the interest of avoiding further delay, and because the Court conclusively finds that the decisional process would not be significantly aided…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ASARCO, LLC v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Asarco v. UprrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Asarco v. UprrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014