Legal Opinion
Schwartz v. Dey
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided March 20, 1984No. 65237PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Judge.
Marcel and Ruth Schwartz, residents of Maryland, brought suit to set aside a collector’s déed to real estate located in Columbia, Missouri, formerly owned by them and sold at a tax sale to Alberta L. and Marion W. Dey. The trial court rejected appellants’ constitutional challenge to the notice provisions of statutes empowering the Collector to collect property taxes and sell land for taxes owed, and granted a motion to dismiss in favor of the Deys. §§ 139.010, 140.170, RSMo 1978. Reversed and remanded.
Appellants contend that the notice provisions of sections 139.010 and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Plemons v. GaleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- City of Boston v. JamesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- Schwartz v. DeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- In Re Tax Appeal of AT & T Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- UNITED ASSET MANAGEMENT TRUST CO. v. ClarkMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.