Legal Opinion

Hankinson v. Deake

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1933No. Docket No. 86, Calendar No. 37,211PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, C. J.

The purpose of this suit was to test the validity of drain proceedings. The hill was filed by owners of land affected by the drain. The defendant Deake was drain commissioner of Washtenaw county at the time the proceedings for the construction of the drain were instituted. Other defendants are the present drain commissioner, the county treasurer, and the township treasurer of Ypsilanti township, where the drain is located.

In accordance with a proper petition, the county drain commissioner established a drainage district comprising about 1,100 acres of land which he designated the “Beyer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clinton v. SpencerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Royal Oak Drain Dist., Oakland County, Mich. v. KeefeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  2. City of Highland Park v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Meyering Land Co. v. SpencerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Patrick v. Shiawassee County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Kennedy v. DingmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API