Legal Opinion
Martinez v. constellis/triple Canopy
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 3, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2020-0153Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LUIS MARTINEZ, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 20-153 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 6, 12 : CONSTELLIS/TRIPLE CANOPY, : : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE I. INTRODUCTION In this hostile work environment suit, Plaintiff Luis Martinez alleges that his employer, Defendant Constellis/Triple Canopy (“Constellis”), violated the D.C. Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”),
D.C. Code § 2-1402.11. Specifically, Mr. Martinez alleges that Constellis employees and supervisors…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Baloch v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.