Legal Opinion
Pallottino v. City of Rio Rancho
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 4, 1994No. 93-2085PublishedCited by 125 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Mr. Pallottino was temporarily detained by police officers (Officers) of the City of Rio Rancho, New Mexico, while they investigated a fist fight. Mr. Pallottino, who contends this detention was due to his refusal to give the Officers his name and address, initially brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for violation of his Fifth Amendment privilege to remain silent. After this claim was summarily dismissed, he sought to amend his complaint to argue an unreasonable seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The district court denied leave to amend. Mr. Pallottino now…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Koch v. City of Del CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Warnick v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Taylor v. MeachamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Barnett v. Hall, Estill, Hardwick, GableCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.