Legal Opinion

The Robert W. Parsons

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 26, 1903No. 16PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

191 U.S. 17 (1903)

THE ROBERT W. PARSONS.

No. 16.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 11, 12.

Decided October 26, 1903.

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

Mr. Martin Clark for plaintiff in error.

Mr. George F. Thompson for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE BROWN, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

This case raises the question of the construction and constitutionality of the statutes of the State of New York, giving a lien for repairs upon vessels, and providing for the enforcement of such lien by proceedings in rem. The statute conferring…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. The Daniel BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. The Propeller Genesee Chief v. FitzhughSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  5. The PlymouthSupreme Court of the United States · 1866

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SeymourCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  2. Southern Surety Co. v. MacMillan Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  3. Upton v. EnglehartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa · 1874
  4. Pacific Mail S. S. Co. v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  5. Southern Pac. Co. v. McCreadyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API