Legal Opinion
Alpine Paper Co. v. Lontz
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 1993No. 62580PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRAHAN, Judge.
Plaintiff, Alpine Paper Company (“Alpine”), appeals the trial court’s judgment for defendants Statia Lontz and PAI Industries (“PAI”) in an action for conversion of collateral in which Alpine had a security interest. We reverse the trial court’s judgment and enter judgment pursuant to Rule 84.14 in favor of Alpine and against both defendants in the amount of $6,500.00.
It is undisputed that Alpine had a valid perfected security interest in a hydraulic paper cutter owned by Brian and Sherri Bolton and located in the State of Iowa. In October 1991, while the security interest was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- In Re Halmar Distributors, Inc., Debtors. General Electric Company v. Halmar Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Lacks v. R. Rowland & Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Prairie State Bank v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Associated Industries v. Keystone General, Inc. (In Re Keystone General, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- FNB OF PICAYUNE v. Pearl River FabricatorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- Dean MacHinery Co. v. Union BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bell v. Lafont Auto SalesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Coffman v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Moore Equipment Company v. HalfertyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.