Legal Opinion · Concurrence

BE&K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 24, 2002No. 01-518Published

1Concurrence

Justice Breyer,

with whom Justice Stevens, Justice

Souter, and Justice Ginsburg join, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.

As I understand the Court’s opinion, it focuses on employer lawsuits that are (1) reasonably based, (2) unsuccessful, and (3) filed with a “retaliatory motive,” i. e., a motive to *539interfere with protected union conduct. See ante, at 532-533. The Court holds that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or Act) does not permit the National Labor Relations Board to declare unlawful under §8(a) of the Act, 29 U. S. C. § 158(a), an employer’s filing suit in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API