Stein v. Pulaski Furniture Corporation
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MICHIE, District Judge.
The defendants in this case have filed answers which include the affirmative defense of the statute of frauds. All the parties have stipulated that the alleged contract, upon which the action is based, was, if ever made at all which the defendants do not admit, an oral contract made in North Carolina for a five-year period of employment and that no written memorandum was made relating to that contract. Since no proof is needed to establish the above admitted facts, a question of law is raised as to the effect of Va.Code § 11-2 which reads, insofar as material, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Burruss v. HinesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1897
- Lams v. F. H. Smith Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935
- Hogue-Kellogg Co. v. G. L. Webster Canning Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- T v. TSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
- Brown v. ValentineDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1965
- Dorothy F. Hewitt and Abram S. Hewitt v. Charles G. Hutter and Luigi GentileCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Baker v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006
- Derthick v. Bassett-Walker, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.