Legal Opinion

Kellems v. Buchignani

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 13, 1974PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Justice.

William Daniel Kellems appeals from an order of the Fayette Circuit Court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Kellems, by counsel, contended in the trial court, as he does here, that he was not competent to understand and comprehend the nature of the proceedings to have him extradited to the state of Arizona. In denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus the trial court noted that the demanding jurisdiction, the Arizona court, should conduct a complete mental examination in order to determine Kellem’s competency to stand trial.

After a careful review of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Charlton v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. State Ex Rel. Davey v. OwenOhio Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PotterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. State Ex Rel. Jones v. WarmuthWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Pruett v. BarrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. HinnantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Welkes v. BrennanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API