Legal Opinion
In Re Vitale
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided April 21, 1989No. 87-312Published
1Opinion of the Court
563 A.2d 613 (1989)
In re Lou R. VITALE.
No. 87-312.
Supreme Court of Vermont.
April 21, 1989.
Motion for Reargument Denied May 26, 1989.
Robert P. McClallen and Arthur A. Mitiguy, Law Offices of Robert P. McClallen, Rutland, for petitioner-appellant.
Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Atty. Gen., and John H. Hasen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montpelier, for amicus curiae State.
Before ALLEN, C.J., PECK, GIBSON and DOOLEY, JJ., and COSTELLO, District Judge (Ret.), Specially Assigned.
GIBSON, Justice.
Petitioner appeals a decision of the Environmental Board (Board) determining that petitioner was subject to Act 250…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Alleghany Corp. v. Breswick & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.