Legal Opinion

American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Hyman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 8, 1926No. 4361PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, doing business in New York, sued defendant, a dealer in scrap iron and metals, at Louisville, Ky., for failure to accept a quantity of electrolytic copper, which plaintiff alleges defendant contracted to buy from it. The only meritorious question presented here concerns the existence or nonexistence of a completed contract of purchase and sale. At the conclusion of the trial by jury each party requested direction of verdict in its or his favor, apparently without request for special or other instructions. Verdict was directed for defendant; The errors…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. A. B. Small Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Beuttell v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. R. P. Andrews & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Jenkins & Reynolds Co. v. Alpena Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baldassarre v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
  2. Northeastern Const. Co. v. City of Winston-SalemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API