Legal Opinion
Con-Tech, Inc. v. Sparks
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided July 11, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CANTRELL, Judge.
This case involves the application of sanctions under Rule 11 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. The trial judge found that the original plaintiffs, Con-Tech, Inc. and Roy N. Strickland, and their attorney, William M. Bouldin, had violated Rule 11 and assessed attorney’s fees and costs against them in the amount of $31,-510.93. For the reasons set forth in this opinion we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
This claim arises out of an action filed in Columbia against J. Collier Sparks, Fries Correctional Equipment, Inc. and E.S.S., Inc. on a foreign judgment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Calloway v. Marvel Entertainment GroupCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Robert G. Jackson, Robert P. Gettys, Attorney-Appellant v. The Law Firm of O'hara, Ruberg, Osborne and TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Anderson v. Latham Trucking Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Andrews v. BibleTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Vermillion v. VermillionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- Ernest R. Fenn and wife, Patsy S. Fenn v. Harry W. Miller, III v. HIghland Credit Bureau, Inc., D/B/A Mid-State Credit BureauCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- John B. Tigrett v. Union Planters BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000