Dunn v. Goodrich Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
This was a suit upon an account. The defendant filed a plea, but withdrew it. The ease does not appear to have been marked in default. When it was called for trial the court, in the absence of the defendant, directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, without requiring the introduction of evidence. The defendant filed a motion for a new trial, but was unable, of course, to furnish a brief of evidence. The motion was overruled, and the defendant excepted. Held: 1. “Where one who is dissatisfied with a verdict seeks to set it aside by a motion for a new trial, a brief of the evidence is an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baker v. Johnson & HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Whitaker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Mize v. Americus Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Holloman v. SmallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richardson v. C. I. T. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Baggett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Graham v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
- Spell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Jill Brothers Inc. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940