Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Goodrich Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 24, 1924No. 15150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

This was a suit upon an account. The defendant filed a plea, but withdrew it. The ease does not appear to have been marked in default. When it was called for trial the court, in the absence of the defendant, directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, without requiring the introduction of evidence. The defendant filed a motion for a new trial, but was unable, of course, to furnish a brief of evidence. The motion was overruled, and the defendant excepted. Held: 1. “Where one who is dissatisfied with a verdict seeks to set it aside by a motion for a new trial, a brief of the evidence is an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baker v. Johnson & HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Whitaker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Mize v. Americus Manufacturing & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Price v. PriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Holloman v. SmallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. C. I. T. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  2. Baggett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Graham v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  4. Spell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Jill Brothers Inc. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API