Jill Brothers Inc. v. Holmes

While I concur in the rulings made and the judgment on the main bill of exceptions, I do not concur in the judgment of dismissal of the cross-bill of exceptions. I am of the opinion that the questions raised by the main bill of exceptions should not be considered for the reason that the cross-bill of exceptions presents a question which is controlling in this case (Cheshire v. Williams, 101 Ga. 814, 29 S. E. 191; Gay v. Gay, 108 Ga. 739, 32 S. E. 846; Smith v. Van Hoose, 110 Ga. 633, 36 S. E. 77), in that the motion for new trial should have been dismissed because there was no brief of…