Baker & Theodore, Inc. v. Quinn
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CLEMENS, Commissioner.
The defendant, Excise Commissioner of the City of St. Louis, revoked the plaintiffs’ liquor license, but on plaintiffs’ application the circuit court set aside the revocation. The defendant commissioner appeals, contending that the revocation was warranted by the record. Both parties treat the action in the circuit court as one for administrative review, as provided by § 536.010 et seq., RSMo 1959, V.A.M.S.
The corporate plaintiff was licensed to sell liquor by the drink in the City of St. Louis, the license being issued to “Baker and Theodore, Inc., Tom Venezia, Managing…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Joice v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Collins v. Division of WelfareSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
- State Ex Rel., De Weese v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Moler v. WhismanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Hoelmer v. HeiskellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Queen of Diamonds, Inc. v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Harrod v. Board of Education, City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Tom Boy, Inc. v. QuinnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Menorah Medical Center v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
- Old Fortress, Inc. v. MyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.