Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hay v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1990No. 89-235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We are again asked to review the commission’s order for “some evidence” pursuant to State, ex rel. Burley, v. Coil Packing, Inc. (1987), 31 Ohio St. 3d 18, 31 OBR 70, 508 N.E. 2d 036. Confining our examination to the evidence cited in the commission’s order, we find no evidence to support its decision.

Dr. Combs’ September 25, 1984 and September 30, 1986 reports attribute appellee’s disability exclusively to his 1975 claim. Similarly, Dr. Katz acknowledges all the allowed conditions, but bases his conclusion essentially on symptoms and restrictions that relate to the later injury.

We reject the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Jennings v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State ex rel. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API