Legal Opinion

Student Doe, by and through her parents, Mother Doe and Father Doe, individually and on their own behalf v. Methacton School District

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 30, 2026No. 2:25-cv-01496Unknown

1Opinion

FORI NT HTEH EE AUSNTIETREND DSTISATTREISC DT IOSTFR PIECNTN CSOYULVRAT NIA STUDENT DOE, by and through her CIVIL ACTION parents, MOTHER DOE and FATHER DOE, individually and on their own behalf , Plaintiffs, NO. 25-1496 v. METHACTON SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. HODGE, J. March 30, 2026 MEMORANDUM In this action, Plaintiffs Student Doe, Mother Doe, and Father Doe (together, “Plaintiffs”) assert claims against Methacton School District (the “Methacton” or “Defendant”) alleging (1) violation of Title IX, 20 U.S.C. § 1681; (2) retaliation in violation of Title IX, 20 U.S.C. § 1681; (3) enforcement…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API