Legal Opinion

534 East 11th Street Housing Development Fund Corp. v. Hendrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 2011PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On a motion to dismiss affirmative defenses pursuant to CELR 3211 (b), the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that the defenses are without merit as a matter of law (see e.g. *542Vita v New York Waste Servs., LLC, 34 AD3d 559, 559 [2006]; Santilli v Allstate Ins. Co., 19 AD3d 1031, 1032 [2005]). In deciding a motion to dismiss a defense, the defendant is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable intendment of the pleading, which is to be liberally construed (Warwick v Cruz, 270 AD2d 255 [2000]). A defense should not be stricken where there are questions of fact requiring trial (see…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Levandusky v. One Fifth Avenue Apartment Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. NBT Bancorp Inc. v. Fleet/Norstar Financial Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Thome v. Alexander & Louisa Calder FoundationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Vita v. New York Waste Services, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Warwick v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ahluwalia v. St. George's University, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  2. Lemle v. LemleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Yong Ki Hong v. KBS America, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  4. Bilinski v. Keith Haring Foundation, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. Scholastic Inc. v. Pace Plumbing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API