Pan Am Systems, Inc. v. Hardenbergh
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint for failure to state claims on which relief can be granted. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. The Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiffs are given leave to file an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days from the date of this order.
FACTS ALLEGED IN THE COMPLAINT
The Plaintiffs are Pan Am Systems, Inc. (“Pan Am”), its subsidiary, Springfield Terminal Railway Company (“Springfield Terminal”), and David Andrew…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ayyadurai v. Floor64, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
- Green v. CosbyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Franchini v. Bangor Publ'g Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2019
- CORINTH PELLETS LLC v. ANDRITZ INCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2020
- HALL v. PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.