Legal Opinion

Hyman v. Caspary

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 25, 1909Published

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District. Action by Isaac B. Hyman against Alfred H. Caspary and another. From a Municipal. Court judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Per curiam

The court found for defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

The facts appear to be substantially as follows: Defendants are stockbrokers, and Ellis Hyman and his two sons, the plaintiff and M. E. Hyman, were customers of defendants. Ellis Hyman, on- August 3, 1908, was carrying on his account 100.shares of Illinois Central Railroad stock, upon which a dividend was declared of $350, payable September 1, 1908. M. E. Hyman was carrying 100 shares of Westinghouse, and on August 18, 1.908, the account of said M. E. Hyman was running somewhat low, and defendants called the attention of Ellis Hyman to his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baltzen v. . NicolayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Campbell v. MullerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API