Campbell v. Muller
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by defendant from judgment of tbe Eighth District Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMoAdam, J.
The defendant’s son-in-law, Mr. Marquand, looked at two horses, one sorrel and the other bay, which the plaintiff had for sale. He selected the sorrel and agreed to purchase it for $115 if, after trial, it suited him. For this purpose it was sent over to the stables of the Rational Guard in. Brooklyn. Marquand tried the horse, and decided it Would not do for his troop, and went to the state camp at Peekskill without it.
Defendant thereafter wrote plaintiff that the sorrel did not suit his son-in-law, and made an appointment to meet plaintiff for a talk about the bay horse. A meeting was had,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baltzen v. . NicolayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Belknap v. . SealeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- Knapp v. . SimonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Sparman v. . KeimNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Arent v. Squire & JohnsonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1863
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rutherford v. KrauseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Hyman v. CasparyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909