Legal Opinion

Roope v. Provident Institution for Savings

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1944No. 10889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, a married woman residing in Massachusetts, executed a promissory note in that State which, according to its laws, was valid. She later moved with her husband to Florida where a married woman’s note, prior to the enactment of Chapter 21932, Laws of Florida, 1943, F.S.A. §§ 708.08 to 708.10, was void if executed in Florida, and unenforceable if executed elsewhere. But she was pursued by legal action even in this “City of Refuge”, for such Florida formerly was for married women who sought surcease from their written obligations to pay money.

Time was when the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Surf Club v. Tatem Surf Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. Kellogg-Citizens National Bank of Green Bay v. FeltonSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  3. Workingmen's Co-Operative Bank v. WallaceSupreme Court of Florida · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shinn v. McLeodDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API