Legal Opinion

Progress Laundry & Cleaning Co. v. Reciprocal Exchange

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 10, 1937No. 12248PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOND, Justice.

Appellant instituted this suit for damages by fire to a cylindrical 'return tubular boiler, located in its laundry in the city of Dallas. Appellees are the insurance carrier. There is no controversy about the policy of insurance being issued, or that appellant suffered damages, the sole contention being that the fire which caused the damage is what is known in the law books as a “friendly fire.”

At the conclusion of the testimony, the trial being before a jury, the court peremptorily instructed a verdict for the insurance carriers; accordingly, entered judgment against appellant.

I…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reliance Insurance Co. v. NamanTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  2. American Towing Co. v. German Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
  3. McGraw v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. City of New York Ins. Co. v. GugenheimCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Youse v. Employers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  2. Frings v. Farm Bureau Mutual Fire Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. Garfield Mutual Fire & Storm Insurance Ass'n v. CalhounCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Hanover Insurance Company v. SonfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. LL Freeberg Pie Co. v. St. Paul Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API