Dimon v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.

This is a motion made by the defendant company for reargument on two grounds :(1) That the objections and exceptions relied upon by defendant for reversal specifically pointed out the language deemed objectionable; (2) that the rule laid down relating to the summing up of counsel in Williams v. Brooklyn El. R. R. Co. (126 N. Y. 96, 103) was strictly followed and that this court in considering the appeal overlooked that fact.

There was but one question presented to us on this appeal, as we could not consider the amount of damages, to wit: Whether the record contained exceptions authorizing us…