Legal Opinion

People v. Mogul

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1991No. 88CA1573PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge KELLY *

The defendant, Donald E. Mogul, appeals the judgment conviction of first degree sexual assault and crime of violence. Among other allegations of error, he contends that the trial court improperly denied him his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation at trial. See Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); People v. Romero, 694 P.2d 1256 (Colo.1985). We agree, and reverse and remand for new trial.

I

On the morning trial was to begin, defense counsel requested a continuance to conduct further investigation into facts which had only…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. People v. WindhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Don Garriga Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Kogan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. People v. ShreckColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. People v. MunseyColorado Court of Appeals · 2009

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API