Legal Opinion

Eisenberg v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 26, 1965No. 39779PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the court on a motion to dismiss an appeal from an order refusing to vacate a judgment. The judgment was en tered January 10, 1964. No appeal was taken within the 90-day period provided by Minn. St. 605.08. On May 4, 1964, plaintiff moved to vacate the judgment. This motion was denied by order December 14, 1964. The notice of appeal filed January 12, 1965, was from the order refusing to vacate the judgment. Under the appeal statute, § 605.09, no provision is made for an appeal from an order refusing to vacate a judgment.

We held in Tombs v. Ashworth, 255 Minn. 55, 95 N.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tombs v. AshworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. Smith v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  3. Luethi v. StankoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elwell v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. LaFond v. SczepanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  3. Cox v. Wright-Hennepin Cooperative Electric Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API