Legal Opinion

Arakelian v. Southern Pacific Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1920No. Gen. No. 25,341Published

Error to the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Oscar Hebel, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1919.

1Opinion of the Court · MatchettJustice Matchett

Plaintiffs in this case went to trial before a jury upon issues raised under a declaration which alleged that the defendant was a common carrier, and that at certain points in California the plaintiffs had delivered to it certain property described as raisins and cantaloupes, to be carried and delivered by the defendant at points named without the State; that the defendant promised plaintiffs to safely and securely carry the same, but that it defaulted in said promise and delivered the property in a damaged condition.

To this declaration defendant filed the general issue with notice that it…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Matchett.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. The FolminaSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Gamble-Robinson Commission Co. v. Union Pacific RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Illinois Central Railroad v. McClellanIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API