Legal Opinion

Crusselle v. Pugh

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 15, 1880PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Non-suit. Charge of Court. Master and Servant. Damages. Before Judge Clark. City Court of Atlanta. December Term, 1880. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Speer, Justice.

Pugh sued Crusselle in the city court of Atlanta for damages to the amount of three thousand dollars. He alleged that in April, 1871, he was employed by Crusselle in the capacity of a “ striker ” for one Gatewood, a blaster-, who was also in the employment of Crusselle. That on 19th of April, 1871, by reason of the careless and unskillful manner in which said blaster prepared the drill, the charge of powder exploded prematurely, by reason of which the eyes of the petitioner were so injured as to cause him great pain, and finally to deprive him of his eyesight. He further…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corbin v. American MillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  2. Norton v. E. WiswallNew York Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Crusselle v. PughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  3. McGovern v. Columbus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Gregory v. Gray & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. ConnellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API