Legal Opinion

Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Connell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 7, 1943No. 3448Published

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The exceptions to the rulings on the framing of an issue and on the admission of evidence appear to have been waived. The other, exceptions may be considered together.

It is not disputed that in January, 1941, the State Oil Company, by its' authorized agent, Clarence A. Bennett, employed Connell to work for the company at a filling and service,station owned and operated by the company in Manchester; that Bennett was in charge of the station as employee of the company; that Connell continued to work at the station until he was injured while in the performance of his duties on October 27, 1941.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Smith v. BelshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Solomon Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Perry v. Simpson Waterproof Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
  5. Berry v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API