Legal Opinion

Mac Murray v. Mac Murray

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme *841Court (Hughes, J.), entered July 30, 1991 in Albany County, which partially granted plaintiffs motion for certain pendente lite relief.

In determining whether to award counsel fees in a matrimonial action, we have stated that a court "must examine the circumstances of the case and financial circumstances of each of the parties and then exercise its discretion” and that "each case will be sui generis” (Walsh v Walsh, 92 AD2d 345, 347; see also, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879). Applying this standard to the facts of the case now before us, we are of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Walsh v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Davis v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. Foxx v. FoxxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Koerner v. KoernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noble v. NobleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Markov v. MarkovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Laura WW. v. Peter WW.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API