Legal Opinion

Grohoske v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 20, 1932No. 15077PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for murder; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.-

The record in this case shows that on June 8, 1931, at which time this case was first set for trial, a witness named Murphy was not then present. For sufficient reasons the case was reset for July 6th following at which time no application for a continuance was made based on Murphy’s then absence. The application was traversed by the state, and the court heard evidence and refused the continuance. When the motion for new trial was heard, one ground of which was the refusal of the continuance, the court heard…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Red v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Ware v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. Stull v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Hays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. London v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  2. Raifsnider v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API