Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Woodmansee

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 20, 1887PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Evidence. Debtor and creditor. Fraud. Practice in superior court. Attorney and client. Before Judge Marshall J. Clarke. Fulton superior court.

Read the full summary

Evidence. Debtor and creditor. Fraud. Practice in superior court. Attorney and client. Before Judge Marshall J. Clarke. Fulton superior court. September term, 1886. To the statements contained in the opinion, the following additions only are necessary: The petition mentioned in the first division of the opinion charged W. G. Robinson, Jr. and R. Y. Robinson, his brother, with having violated the injunction by collecting money due W. G. Robinson, Jr. after the injunction was granted. The testimony of Leonard and Forbes, the admission of which was complained of in the third and fourth grounds…

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

The complainants, Woodmansee et al., filed their bill in Fulton superior court against the defendants, Robinson et al., alleging that Robinson was indebted to them in a large sum of money, and that he had made a fraudulent sale to his brother, R. Y. Robinson, and had given fraudulent mortgages to Conley et al. Upon the trial of the case, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the complainants, and the defendants moved for a new trial upon the grounds set out in the motion, which was overruled by the court below, and the defendants excepted, and assign error upon the refusal…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clayton v. Exchange BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1903
  2. Dickenson v. StultsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Sullivan v. GinsbergSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  4. Pecora v. First Bank of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. In re VirginDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API