Legal Opinion

Bowen v. True

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 20, 1908No. 6815PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Before Mem mincer, J., Kershaw, 'Exceptions to return of appraisers in Anderson H. Bowen against Sarah A. True et al. Prom Circuit order confirming return, defendants, Sarah A. True, Charles Team, Thurston True, Julia Broom1, Mattie Broom', Roxie Broom and Pearl Eiskew, appeal. cites: Mrs. True can not take land at higher bid, as land is not ta be sold: 10 Rich., 328. cite: What appellants must show to have appraisement set aside: Rich, Bq., 180; 24 S. C, 208; 75 S, C., 369.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court (Judge Memtaiinger presiding) confirming the appraisement of commissioners appointed 'by the Court to value the lands devised by John A. Bowen to plaintiff for the use and benefit of himlself and children, the will providing that thie stone be first valued ’by three disinterested mien who are good judges, and that plaintiff pay to 'his sister, Sarah A. Bowen, one of the defendants, one-half of the valuation in full settlement of her share of s'aid1 plantation for the use and benefit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County of Greenville v. County of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Parrott v. BarrettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API