County of Greenville v. County of Spartanburg
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gage, J., Spartanburg,¿October, 1899. Action by County of Greenville against County of Spartanburg; W. R. Epps, county treasurer, R. P. Epton, county auditor, and Pelham Mills, to enforce award of arbitrators. The following is so much of the complaint as states the first cause of action, and the answer thereto: “I. That the plaintiff is a body' politic and corporate under the laws of the State of South Carolina. “II.
Read the full summary
Before Gage, J., Spartanburg,¿October, 1899. Action by County of Greenville against County of Spartanburg; W. R. Epps, county treasurer, R. P. Epton, county auditor, and Pelham Mills, to enforce award of arbitrators. The following is so much of the complaint as states the first cause of action, and the answer thereto: “I. That the plaintiff is a body' politic and corporate under the laws of the State of South Carolina. “II. That the defendant, the County of Spartanburg, is a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of South Carolina. “III. That the defendants, W. R. Epps and R.…
1Opinion of the Court
This opinion was filed August 1, 1901, but remittitur held up on petition for rehearing until
November 29, 1901. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This action was instituted to enforce an award by a board of surveyors appointed under the provision of a joint resolution of the General Assembly, approved January 5, 1895, providing for the location of the boundary line between Greenville and Spartanburg counties, at and near Pelham factory. This appeal comes from the decree of Judge Gage, dismissing the complaint, which decree is officially reported herewith. For a full statement of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Abbeville County v. McMillanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
- Bollmann v. BollmannSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1875
- Rounds & Hagler v. Aiken Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
- McCall v. McCallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- In re the Estate of CrouseNew York Surrogate's Court · 1901
3Cited by8 opinions
- Martin Glass v. Kidder Peabody & Co., Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Daniel J. Mulhaul William F. BranstonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- La Stella v. Garcia EstatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Clinton Water Ass'n v. Farmers Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
- General Construction Co. v. Hering Realty Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1962
- La Stella v. Garcia Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.