Legal Opinion
Raymond A. Roles v. Lee Maddox
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 28, 2006No. 04-35280PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Raymond Roles (“Roles”), a prisoner appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his § 1983 complaint asserting First and Fourteenth Amendment claims because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), enacted by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”), § 803(d) Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to exhaust, Ngo v. Woodford, 403 F.3d 620, 622 (9th Cir.2005), and affirm.
Section 1997e(a)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Napoleon Hartsfield v. Pete Vidor, Deputy, Sued in His Individual and Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Ross v. County of BernalilloCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Angel Soto v. Unknown SweetmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Ernest Lee Vaden v. K. Summerhill R.L. Gower St. Andre Chapman W.A. DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- William Thornton v. Edmund G. Brown, JrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Parthemore v. ColCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Henderson v. AyersDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.