Legal Opinion

Cimarron Pipeline Construction, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 16, 1993No. 75109PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMA WILSON, Justice.

Pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S.1981, §§ 1601 et seq., the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma certified the following question to this Court:

“Is economic compulsion or economic duress recognized as an independent tort under Oklahoma law?”

This question of law arises out of allegations by plaintiff (Cimarron) that it and similarly situated employers, as a prerequisite to the purchase of workers’ compensation insurance, were coerced by defendant (USF & G) and all other insurers who write workers’…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Centric Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  3. ZD Howard Company v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Wagg v. HerbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  5. State Ex Rel. Turpen v. Oklahoma State Board for Property & Casualty RatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beck v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  2. Roberts v. Wells Fargo AG Credit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  3. RCB Bank v. Carter (In Re Carter)District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Beck v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  5. CIMARRON PIPELINE CONST. v. US Fid. & Guar. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API