Legal Opinion
Cox v. Queen Insurance Company of America
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 10, 1963No. 14134PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Plaintiff, Paul Cox, sued to recover damages to his pier and bath house under the terms of his insurance policy with Queen Insurance Company of America. The trial court granted judgment for the defendant upon jury findings, the force of which brought the damages within the express exclusionary provisions of the contract. We affirm the judgment.
Plaintiff owned a pier and bath house at Fulton Beach in Aransas County, which were damaged on September 11, 1961. His policy provided that he was insured against direct loss resulting from windstorm, hurricane, or hail. The insurance…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coyle v. Palatine Ins. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1920
- Brindley v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Newark Trust Co. v. Agricultural Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- National Fire Insurance v. CrutchfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gillis v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- National Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. Valero Energy Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Cagle v. Commercial Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Auten v. Employers National Inurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Hanover Insurance Company v. SonfieldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.