Legal Opinion

Lincoln v. Quick

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1933No. Docket No. 1028PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for damages arising from an automobile accident which occurred on July 13, 1931, while the plaintiff was riding as the guest of the defendant. At that time, section 141% of the California Vehicle Act required the plaintiff in such a case to establish intoxication, wilful misconduct or gross negligence on the part of the defendant in order to recover, and the respondent contends that gross negligence was here established.

The appellant did not appear at the trial and the only evidence as to how the accident occurred is found in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Diamond v. WeyerhaeuserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Brown v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Rosander v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harlan v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API