Legal Opinion
Arthur S. Kurlan v. Howard H. Callaway, Secretary of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 27, 1974No. 475, Docket 74-2347PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:
The central question raised by this appeal is whether certain members of the New York Army National Guard (“the Guard” herein) are entitled, after five years of service in the Guard as part of our country’s Ready Reserve, to be transferred to the Standby Reserve (an organization requiring less active participation in military activities than does the Guard) by reason of their having been members of Guard units that were called by the President of the United States to active duty in 1970 pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 673 to assist the Postmaster General in maintaining postal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Gilligan v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hammond v. LenfestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Thomas C. Smith, Appellant-Petitioner v. Stanley S. Resor, Secretary of the Army, Appellee-RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frank D. Jones v. New York State Division of Military and Naval Affairs and New York State Army National GuardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- J. Gary Madsen v. The United States of America, Ex Rel. The United States Army, Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. GhailaniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Febus Nevárez v. SchlesingerDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1977
- Hughes v. FrankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976